Nokia Lumia 635 WIndows Phone Review

microsoft-nokia-lumia-635

Photo Credit: Microsoft

How do you approach comparing a $50 off-contract smartphone? I suppose you don’t. You buy one – and the rest doesn’t much matter. If you are not a supreme gadget nerd, then you may consider the Lumia 635 as a starter smartphone, a disposable replacement for a lost device, or a cheap way to try the latest from Microsoft’s Windows Phone.

Software: Windows Phone as a OS is a pretty standard affair. You won’t find skinning or much manipulation outside of the occasional carrier bloat apps. My Lumia 635 was branded for AT&T prepaid GoPhone service and was littered with AT&T locker, TV, Navigation, Address Book, and other apps of dubious usefulness. Luckily – these can all be removed without restriction.

The Lumia 635 runs the latest version of Windows Phone 8.1. It even has received the latest Lumia Denim update to bring Cortana and folder support. Because of the lesser hardware spec on the device, the phone does not support rich capture camera modes or other settings menu options that are enabled on other devices. Perhaps more important than this however, is that the phone is compatible with Windows Phone 10 beta builds. It is the cheapest way to try out Windows Phone 10 for those adventurous enough.

Performance of the Windows Phone OS was excellent. The additional app transitions and large font styling of the OS mask the lower performance of the internals quite well. Low internal specs are obvious however when switching between apps. Moving between Spotify and Here Maps added a couple seconds delay as a loading bar of trailed dots trail across the screen. For most users, this will not seem a bottleneck as the switching delays are universal and consistent – regardless the number of apps open. The 635 however will not satisfy anyone who has used recent mid-range models such as the 1020, or high-end 1520, and icon.

Hardware: Inside the 635 is a quad core Snapdragon 400, clocked at 1.2Ghz, 1GB RAM, and a 5MP rear camera. The front facing camera is dropped as part of keeping the device cost low. The screen at 4.5” has a lower 480×854 resolution and 221 ppi. This ppi is quite respectable given the price. The panel itself is IPS and advertises Nokia’s ClearBlack technology. This proves to be simply advertising jargon in practice, as black levels are worse than those in the last generation 520 model. In total however, the panel ranks high against low cost Android models in which it competes – even if a step backwards from the 520 forebear.

Special mention is deserved for the sound out of the device. The back panel mono speaker gets very loud and clear – a Lumia tradition. The device does lack sound EQ options in its settings. Something I missed sorely when comparing to higher-end Lumia models. The back of the device can be removed and swapped for punchy plastic replacement backs. I opted for an eye-searing orange. Inside also houses a micro-sd card slot to supplement the paltry 8GB internal storage. My device purred with a 64GB micro-sd holding photos, downloaded podcasts, and apps.

Conclusion: A lot of people will buy the Lumia 635 as test hardware. It is the cheapest you can sample Windows Phone 10 today. For this – there is no better option. For the general consumer, the Lumia 635 is a sturdy, low cost, and well performing handset. It may be wholly impossible to buy the handset at $50 and find fault. All hardware specs and performance rate well for the price. The only major deal-breaker, being those who absolutely require a front-facing camera. The Lumia also will see distribution as wide as any flagship, including the iPhone. It is on sale for virtually every US carrier and has equally wide distribution outside the US. At $50, you can’t go wrong. Approved.

Rating: 9 of 10

Yezz Billy 4.7 Windows Phone Review

Yezz Billy 4.7 Windows Phone

On a random day, I strolled into the Microsoft Store to browse. No purchase in mind, just browse. Windows 10 for Phone Preview had just been announced and I was also in the market for a new laptop. I stumbled across the Yezz Billy 4.7, which sold for $179 unlocked. It was an excuse for me to jump back into trying Windows Phone. Here are my impressions of the cheap and cheery, unlocked device.

Hardware: At $179, the Yezz Billy is a good value. It ships with Windows 8.1, a 4.7″ 720p IPS LCD screen, Snapdragon 200 quad core chip at 1.2ghz, 1GB RAM, with 8MP rear and 2MP front cameras along with 2 SIM slots (only 1 being 3g capable). On paper, the device is solidly mid-range for a budget price. Sadly the Yezz Billy does not live up to the sum of its parts.

Build quality is solid, but firmly in budget category. The device ships with removable back in red, blue, and white. It even includes a screen protector and headphones in the box. In hand, the device is the lightest I have used in recent memory and is a claim to fame. I began fearing I would crack the device and opted not to store it in my usual back-pocket location.

Inside the device, the Snapdragon 200 chip falls at the low end of current offerings, slotting even below the $100 Lumia 635 which contains a Snapdragon 400 chipset. Performance was acceptable, but noticeably slowed by the chip. The devices proved unable to play 720p video from the mobile YouTube site, and 3rd party players. This ended up being pretty irksome and was a performance issue I ran into a lot. Other maladies of the device hardware included the built in sound chip which provided low quality sound and background noise when using anything other than the includes earbuds.

Camera performance on the device was also subpar. Both still shots and video lacked details and dynamic range. Typically I wouldn’t notice a lack of range, but frequently shadows made objects completely blacked out in a way I had not had to care about before. Front camera performance was slightly better, producing soft shots that were on par with other mid-range devices, such as my Nexus 5.

The screen on the device is a definite high point. Excellent viewing angles, color, and brightness. Excellent black levels as well. The screen punches above its weight class. Because the device is a slab, the screen masks the other imperfections. But the novelty of the excellent screen is lost after the first week, and every other aspect of the hardware was a sever compromise.

Software: The Yezz Billy ships with stock Windows 8.1. There is no carrier bloat, although the device does ship with Amazon Kindle and Evernote preinstalled.

Moving around the Windows Phone interface is as seem-less as ever. Due to memory management of the OS, it quickly became an issue the way the phone suspended and resumed background applications. Using the phone for navigation and toggling to Spotify to change tracks resulted in a multi-second delay to resume the music player. Certain Microsoft apps also had trouble functioning. The build in podcast client did not correctly scale the interface, instead producing very small tiles, out of place with the large print OS interface. The Yezz Billy also does not support any of the specific Lumia apps, such as Nokia Camera, and Mix Music.

There are still places Windows Phone is lacking, most major apps are available. It is more than a cheat though, as apps such as Twitter and Instagram are a couple version behind and lack timely updates available on other platforms. This is not a detractor however, as using Windows Phone is a choice that comes with understanding the ecosystem. No one should be surprised or disappointed with the app selection – its a point thats been made rote. Certain backend functionality is still missing in the OS however. Notifications cannot be acted on from the notification shade, as done in Android and IOS. The OS also lack fine control over Bluetooth, such as the ability to rename devices, or enable/disable bluetooth profiles on a device. The later prevented my from turning off calling to the bluetooth adepter in my car (which had no microphone).

Conclusion: The Yezz Billy looks like an excellent package when viewing the screen and handling its light build. It comes packaged with value adds, such as a screen protector, 3 interchangeable back plates, and headphones. Unfortunately, these few areas are outnumbered by the odd defects and performance issues of the device. Perhaps this comes with using a non-Lumia handset. The device seemed to have fully skipped quality testing and any form or tuning the OS installation for the device. Not recommended.

Verdict: 6/10

Techphyre Review: LG G2 Smartphone

Image

Samsung has enjoyed dominance in the Android smartphone space for quite some time now, it wouldn’t be a stretch to say that LG has fallen into a rut as a constant #2. Although the company is still in the ‘fast follow’ mode, entering nearly every nice as second to Samsung – the company looks to be throwing more research dollars into developing phone functions that set it apart. Enter the LG G2…

Hardware: The G2, by every measure is a flagship smartphone. It has been on the market now for a half year, and is shipping on all of the Big 4 carriers in the US – a major win for LG. With the recent announcement of the LG G Pro 2 phablet, the older G2 is again of interest for those not quite ready for a larger than life smartphone.

The main attraction of the LG G2 is a 5.2” 1080p panel. This particular unit is hailed as using extremely small bezels in implementation. A closer look however will reveal a buffer space at the edge of the display that is a couple pixels wide, this would normally be covered by plastic bezel – so nothing groundbreaking here, just a different implementation.  As part of the smaller bezels, LG made the choice to made the choice to move the power and volume keys to the back of the device. The new placement was ergonomic and easy to get used to in practice. Not a gimmick, but a legitimate alternative for the standard smartphone ergonomics.

Other hardware bits include a Snapdragon 800 CPU at 2.2Ghz, 2GB RAM, and 32GB storage my T-Mobile model. No SD card, or removeable battery is available in the G2. In operation, the high-end hardware all worked well together, the device benchmarks slightly higher than the Nexus 5 smartphone that shares similar internals and Snapdragon CPU.

Software: Since most modern smartphone falls into predictable categories of low-end, midrange, and high-end, manufacturers – most notoriously, LG and Samsung, have relied on heavily modified Android software to differentiate their handsets. LG’s implementation of Android carrier very cartoony UI styling, with very bright coloring. It performs better than Samsung Touchwiz, but is just as intrusive. LG has also implemented a number of conflicting software options, such as LG Cloud storage that overa with services offered by Google. Overall, the software is middle of the road, rating behind that of stock Android, and lighter skinnings such as those from Sony – but above the heavier Samsung interface. Notable enhancements that came with the additional bloat, include “Knock-On”, which allows the phone to be waken, or placed in sleep with two taps. Other features such as slide-aside are not as useful, again conflicting with built-in Android multi-tasking.

Camera: A special mention is needed for the camera on the LG G2. At 13MP, it is not competing on numbers with Nokia or Sony, which have higher specs sensors. It does however include optical image stabilization which help churn out great images consistently. The camera has more lag than most any other phone I have tested – but in stock form offered 9-point auto focus, which while nice – was likely slowing it down.

Conclusion: The LG is a very good high-end Android device. It can be had for as little as $99 from a number of carriers. It packs high-end specs, including plenty RAM and a good camera. Perhaps most importantly, it delivered on excellent battery life, allowing users to be truly mobile. In the current crop of high-end handsets, the LG earns top marks – and also happens to be my current “daily driver”.

Rating: 8 of 10

Techphyre is Hiring!

Technology JobsTechphyre is hiring and looking for enthusiastic tech bloggers like you!

Do you spend late nights reading Engadget, TechCrunch, Slashdot and the like? Do you live and breathe technology to the point of obsession? Then we’re looking for you!

About the job: Techphyre.com is looking for freelance technology writers to expand coverage at the site. Ideal candidates would have a background in technology and experience in professional writing. The assignment is freelance pay-per-post, and has no location requirement.

Ideal candidates would commit to writing 1-5 posts per week and be willing to share their work through social media.

About You:

  • A few words about yourself.

  • Your contact and location info.

  • Links to social media (facebook, linkedin, twitter, google+)

Writing Sample:

  • A writing sample (500 words or less) covering a technology product, service, or event.

Send email to admin@techphyre.com to apply!

Motorola Moto G Review

Image

It wasn’t a surprise when Google announced that they put in a bid to buy Motorola Mobility. It’s Android operating system was rapidly expanding and under threat of patent litigation from rivals. Google itself had no history in telecom and did not have the patents to defend itself. This is, until it bought Motorola.

Two years after the acquisition, Motorola has burned through it’s line of second-rate smartphone offerings, and starting with the acclaimed Moto X, is now producing product fully under the tutilage of its parent company Google. Moto G is the second product of this formula – aimed squarely at the low end of the Android market.

Hardware: Moto G retail prices start at $179 for an 8BG model, and $199 for a 16GB unit. Outside of the storage allotment, all Moto G models ship with a 5MP rear camera, 1.2MP from shooter, 1GB RAM, and quad-core Snapdragon 400 processor clocked at 1.2Ghz. A very well rounded package. Prior to Android 4.4, 1GB of RAM would have been a concern – but performance of the Android 4.4 operating system has been mostly smooth in testing. Photos taken on the other hand were average to poor out of the 5MP rear camera. It’s video recording specifically is limited to only 720p and it noticeably less sharp that most any other android device that have all standardized on 1080p.

On top of the internals is a nice 4.5” guerrilla glass 3 display at 720p. Even at 720p, the display has pixel density in the range of iPhone 5 and was a pleasure to use. Motorola chose wisely in not skimping too much on the display. It is not made using AMOLED technology, but instead is a cheaper LCD panel – but performs well overall. Rounding out the hardware is a rear-facing speaker that plays loud but lack any richness when compared to current champs HTC One and iPhone 5.

My favorite function of the device overall may be the replaceable back covers, the covers are sold direct from Motorola, and come in multiple colors. My current back is an electric lime green. The Moto G is sure to be favored by a younger audience that wants a custom look – that can be changed with their mood. The flexibility of swapping the candy colored back may be the only advantage it holds over the more expensive Moto X.

Software: Motorola did well in sticking with a stock android experience on the Moto G. I wondered how the lower-end hardware would have coped with laters of bloat or skinning. Other than the base 4.4 built, Motorola does include a few Motorola specific aplications, such as Moto assist – but these can be easily disabled from the application menu.

Although 1GB RAM runs android 4.4 well – the phone did begin to slow once 20 or more applications were installed. Even is closing all apps, the additional installation required more services when the phone booted – leaving less memory for Android processes. This phone is not for power users. The lack of RAM was most apparent when multitasking between multiple application windows. Opening and closing the apps would begin to slow and transitions stutter for more visually heavy applications. 90% however would never reach such load to create this scenario.

Conclusion: The Moto G is a polished and well rounded smartphone, it cuts back in places that are not too obvious while providing all the functions a user expects. The processor, RAM, and screen combination works well together with Android 4.4. The swappable back covers make the devices also visually unique. At $179, the device is not for power users – but it is a value that is not matched by anything else in its class.

Score: 9 of 10

First Look: Logitech Z600 Bluetooth Speakers

Image Credit: iLounge

Now that just about everything is connecting over bluetooth, including fitness gadgets and countless portable speakers. Logitech has released the Z600 – a wall powered set of USB speakers that connect over bluetooth to PC’s smartphones and other gadgets supporting USB.

Hardware: THe Z600 speaker set is well made, shipping in a minimalistic box. The speakers themselves are white cones with a grill that wraps roughly 75% of the cone. Each speaker has a cable coming from its back to connect to each other, with the connecting block going to wall power. One of the two speakers houses touch volume on the top of the cone, an aux port, as well as the bluetooth pairing button. The speakers currently retail for roughly $130 in the US.

The Z600 set can pair with up to 3 devices. Pairing with my PC and smartphone was without issue and the Z600 is able to stay connecting simultaneously – meaning that is you hit pause on one source and play on the other, there is no delay. The polish there was much appreciated.

Sound Quality: Sound quality is a downside for the Z600 set. Although most sources are going to be piped over bluetooth and through streaming services, the Z600 set seemed to flatten everything it played. There was little to no high-end treble, no sparkle to classical or vocal heavy tracks. The speakers cones each have 3 drives, two in the tower facing forward, and one down-firing speaker for low-range notes. Bass on the pair was respectable with a system not including a subwoofer. Folks stepping up from most bluetooth speakers will be pleased. Anyone moving from a traditional desktop speaker pairing will be disappointed – I look squarely at the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 and Creative T40 sets that can be had for the same price (but are harder to find at retail.

Conclusion: At the price, the Z600 set offer a reasonable value, the sound quality is simply too flat to recommend however. The system plays plenty loud with reasonable bass, but does not actually sound better than many higher-end bluetooth portable speaker such as the Monster iClarity, Beats Pill, and Logitechs own UE BOOM. Unless room-filling bluetooth audio on a tight budget is your only requirement, the recommendation is to stick with the more crystal sounding Logitech UE Boom.

Score: 6 of 10